Lawrence Phillips Info

 

For I know the plans I have for you," declares the Lord, "plans to prosper you and not to harm you,
plans to give you hope and a future" -Jeremiah 29:11 --Holy Bible

 

 

 

 

  | Home Page |Court-Related | Getting Personal | Images  | Sports Fans | Contact Us |

Welcome to the only official Lawrence Phillips Website

It's official!!

Phillips Appeals Continues

Despite Lower Court 2nd Attempt to Deny Phillips!!

 

    

The San Francisco Chronicle reported on March 5, 2009 that Phillips "cannot withdraw no contest plea". Shame on the Chronicle! Your bias is showing. When Phillips successfully challenged this same appeal court's decision in California Supreme Court in 2008, the Chronicle along with 50 other US newspapers were sent press releases and not one paper printed news of Phillips' successful challenge. Now the SF Chronicle would have you believe this court's second denial is final. Not so; there is such a thing as due process, whether the Chronicle agrees with the law or not, Phillips has not exhausted his right to appeal. Shame on you. For those of you who are interested in information other than what you are being conditioned to believe by media, here is what preceded the recently reported appeal decision.

 

On May 14, 2008 California's 2nd District Court of Appeals handed down a ruling which cleared the way for  former NFL player Lawrence Phillips to proceed with an appeal which challenges a hearing from a felony domestic violence plea which Phillips and his (then) attorney have contended since 2000, was coerced.  The prior "no contest" plea is considered a conviction under U.S. law and it played a significant role in Phillips 2006 trial which alleged assault with a deadly weapon (a car). The prior plea is the on-going subject of a hearing in which the California Supreme Court, by unanimous decision in 2007, found merit favoring Phillips. The higher court's ruling essentially opposed a  lower appeals court's ruling, sending the matter back to the lower appeals court for reconsideration. Upon subsequent review, the lower appeals court distanced itself from its previous stance, ruling that the petition was unnecessary to Phillips' on-going appeal.  This decision moves Phillips a step closer to what has proven to be an uphill legal battle for his day in (appeals) court. Phillips' appeals  are still fiercely contested by the Attorney General's office. That office represents retired Judge Bernard Kamins,  the presiding judge in the court proceedings which Phillips' appeal references AND the same judge who was dismissed for bias from the 1990's Rodney King beatings trials involving Los Angeles Police Officers. Optimistic over the higher appeal court's decision, a relative suggested public exposure may help get the message across that significant  matters implied, reported and written about Lawrence over the years are less than factual. Conceding to the reality of the press ignoring most things constructive about him, Lawrence quietly responded that he is waiting on God because that is the one who has moved on his behalf and who gives him hope.

Why a website featuring internationally acclaimed former professional football player (NFL, NFL Europe, CFL) Lawrence Phillips and why now? This website is: a God-given answer to prayers of how to address years of public misperceptions of Phillips and their impact; 2) about raising awareness of and solutions to alliances that willfully misrepresent the truth, create and promote negative stereotypes, and make nearly impossible any meaningful legal process for certain persons; and 3) to encourage the world audience that suffering has the potential to help us learn from our errors and aid our future! Adversity can help us seek a genuine connection with the Spirit that created all and whom makes all things, even redemption, possible.

Looking forward to a new direction for the unfolding of Lawrence Phillips' very public legal and personal challenges, we are encouraged by California's Supreme Court decision finding apparent cause to examine a lower appeals court's decision regarding a prior conviction in 2000 against Phillips. California's highest court remanded the appeal to the 2nd District Appellate Court, and that court shelved its original ruling. This same prior conviction was the basis for prosecutor's demand for a 20-year sentence in Phillips' sentencing which was pending for two years and resulted in a 10-year sentence on October 3, 2008.  The 2006 alleged "assault with a deadly weapon" (a car) resulted in no deaths, non-life threatening  injuries, no hospitalizations, and mitigating circumstances which caused the car Phillips was driving to spin out of control.

A good outcome is anticipated for Phillips' challenges and for everyone who has been impacted.  A part of that process is to correct misinformation that for more than a decade has used Phillips' newsworthiness as a public figure to knowingly, maliciously, and persistently misinform audiences about him and exploit alleged victims by embellishing facts, most notoriously the "college girlfriend hand-bashing". This report, along with other false and inappropriate characterizations are addressed in this website click here for more .

While it is understandable that the public response to reports of contemptible acts is outrage, it is always inappropriate to create or join a public outcry before critically thinking and searching beyond the reported mayhem, perversity, exaggeration and propaganda to uncover the facts.  In Lawrence Phillips' state of affairs, as in those of countless others, falsehoods and half-truths promoted in the public arena have undermined the capacity of just and fair actions by those who desire to honestly and fairly interpret, uphold and execute the law.

It is the mission of this website to: 

  • present documented facts and truths that help those willing to pursue and apply justice only when appropriate, fair and lawful, to be well-informed of truths regarding Phillips

  • re-establish and broaden Lawrence Phillips' circle of influence

  • most importantly, affirm what has already been established by the only unequivocal power that is always both witness and judge: that Lawrence Phillips has a good future, ordained by the Creator and evidenced by the things that God, the Creator, has already begun to reveal!


Sentencing Over, Fight Continues

 

The sentencing's over. The 10-year sentence (or one-half of the 20 years demanded), was to some degree impacted by an ongoing Supreme Court decision that, to date, favors Phillips' position on a prior conviction.

 

During sentencing, a juror claiming jury misconduct gave a sworn affidavit that was disregarded by the judge.

 

How can a trial referee take no notice of constitutional rules, as if they don't exist?  Conflicts involving corporations are decided by interpreting contracts (often in ways that differ from the original intent). Should courtroom referees (judges), like corporations, interpret the rules as they wish and as they go along, ignoring the expressed intent of law and forcing incarceration while the accused waits for the fairness of higher courts? In corporate environments, the law is fluid and increasingly stands for whatever the more powerful and influential say it stands for. Should the guiding principle of corporations and the contracts that govern them have a place in the courtroom? Are legal processes and penalties that ignore the boundaries of the law acceptable in a country which has the ideal of "government by the people" as well as "for the people"? Is it acceptable for officials of the law to twist the law at will if the accused is considered "personally obnoxious"? This may not matter to you now because it is happening to Lawrence Phillips; but be forewarned: to ignore the exploitation of the constitutional and human rights of another is to give the offenders that same permission to ignore protections of your own "liberties".   It will be interesting to note how many of you will insist upon your "rights" should you fall out of public grace based on your response to "unjust" financial loss during the impending economic crisis. Like the "Bond" movie where a clever mask made the enemy think he was killing his rival while, in reality, destroying his own manpower; shall you soon experience the horror that your willingness to go along with violating the fair justice "rights" of persons promoted as "obnoxious" by media  (i.e. celebrities, pro-athletes, etc.) was but a pathway to neutralizing your own "rights" at the appointed time?

 

******************************************************

                                          

A hearty thank-you to coaches, former team members and co-workers, family and friends who not only wrote numerous letters of support, but personally appeared at the sentencing on Lawrence Phillips' behalf in support of fair and just sentencing.

 

Additionally, we are ecstatic that post-sentencing, many of you have tuned into the Lawrence Phillips website for the flip-side of what traditional news refuses to report. Many of your comments reveal that you do not support misconduct that has been carried out against Lawrence Phillips and wish him well in the struggle for fairness and justice. We appreciate your comments, support and continued contact through our "Contact Us" page! Please check regularly for updates!

 

 Click here to return to Top of Page

Copyright 2007 by LawrencePhillips.info.  All Rights Reserved. This Page Last Updated Nov 2008.